Skip to main content

City planners too eager?


CATCH News – March 26, 2010
Making the official plan official
This week’s denial of the St Joseph’s Villa twin condo proposal could mark a shift in council’s approach to frequent official plan amendments. Councillors’ comments on the recent Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) rejection of a Dundas self-storage facility underlined their concerns that the city has been too eager to change the plan to accommodate development proposals.
Brad Clark referenced the OMB decision when he moved the motion to deny the condo plans. He said Hamilton’s official plan might be better named “the official guidelines” and said it was time the city actively defended its plans – a task he suggested had instead been taken up most effectively by Dundas residents who had “methodically” shown that the condo proposal was not consistent with the city’s written policies.
In seconding the rejection motion, Brian McHattie endorsed Clark’s position, while Bob Bratina argued that residential intensification projects should be directed to downtown areas rather than the suburbs. The only planning committee member to oppose Clark’s motion was Dave Mitchell, but he made it clear that his reasons were financial and that he didn’t want the city put in the situation of having to pay for outside planners for OMB hearings where council has rejected the recommendations of its own planning staff.
That will be required if St Joseph’s appeals the council condo decision to the OMB. A similar situation prevailed for the self-storage facility where a council rejection in 2009 was again based largely on research and arguments presented by residents in opposition to the staff support of the project.
Terry Whitehead recalled that staff had contended it would be very difficult to find an outside planner willing to defend council’s position on the self-storage facility. One was found – the highly regarded Joe Berridge of Urban Strategies – and the OMB officer sided strongly with him rather than the city’s planner who testified at the hearing for the proponent.
In his rejection of the self-storage proposal, JP Atcheson summarized the evidence of both Berridge and city planner Edward John.
“He (Mr John) maintained throughout his evidence that the use being proposed was compatible with the surrounding uses and that the built form being proposed would meet the objectives of the Town of Dundas Official Plan,” noted Atcheson. “He continued to maintain that from the material supplied with the application that he was satisfied that the site could be developed in conformity with the planning polices in place and with some minor changes, which could occur through the site plan review process, any of the new concerns presented to him could be met.”
“Mr. Berridge proffered that the self storage use was not an appropriate use in an open space area and that in his opinion, the current Special Policy Open Space Designation and uses currently allowed by the Zoning By-law for the site, represented good planning for the area and should be maintained,” wrote Atcheson. “It was his opinion that a full and fair reading of the planning policies in place as set out in his witness statement, would not support the change in land use designation being proposed …, nor did he subscribe to the notion that the self storage facility use was a ‘benign use’ but instead proffered that its inherent design characteristics and site needs, were not consistent with the direction to maintain and ‘not destroy the open space nature of the area’.”
Atcheson’s ruling clearly supported Berridge over John. He concluded that both Hamilton and Dundas “have made conscious and deliberate planning decisions to maintain the open space character of this site due to its proximity to Cootes Paradise Wetland Complex, an Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and have established policies “to ensure that even limited development of the site is undertaken in a manner that respects the unique character of the area.”
Dundas residents contend that the condo proposals also contradict numerous city policies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

a vision for nature in Cootes

View the Eco-Park Document here Make Cootes national park, group urges TheSpec.com - Local - Make Cootes national park, group urges Create eco-park in urbanized area Eric McGuinness , The Hamilton Spectator (Jan 28, 2009) The idea of a Cootes Paradise National Park is being revived by local conservationists. But they say it is jeopardized by plans for a self-storage warehouse beside the Desjardins Canal at the east entrance to Dundas. They point to a new vision of an urban eco-park -- maybe a national park -- incorporating the Cootes marsh, drafted by Urban Strategies Inc., the firm responsible for McMaster University's campus master plan among other Hamilton projects. Joe Berridge, a partner who has helped reshape waterfronts in Toronto, New York and London, produced the concept document at the invitation of Ben Vanderbrug, retired general manager of the Hamilton Conservati

Slow Sign and Turtle Time

THEY SAY: Information Report: April 3, 2017 SUBJECT/REPORT NO: Rare Turtle Recovery, Wildlife Corridor Issues and Roads of Issue at Cootes Paradise (PW16024a) - (City Wide) Traffic Issues on Cootes Drive Traffic Operations & Engineering has been working with the Ward 13 Councillor on traffic signage along Cootes Drive. Four (4) traffic signs (with flashing lights) operating during turtle migration season will be installed in the spring of 2017. The migration period for turtles is generally around the months of June, early July and September but can vary due to weather conditions. The traffic signs are useful in alerting motorists of potential turtle crossings on that roadway. RESTORE COOTES SAYS: Is it working? Is there any evidence that it is helping turtles or even slowing vehicles? We're betting it has little to no impact - the light is always flashing, if turtles are present or not, the road is built for speed and it makes it dangerous to slow down. We hope

Where did the water go? Art action in Lot M Parking

West Campus Eco-Art Project  A walking activity and site activation on McMaster’s West Campus.  West Campus Eco-Art Project is a project that incorporates creative walking activities and an artistic site activation connected with the West Campus Redesign Initiative at McMaster University. The initiative provides opportunities for connecting with nature through an on-line informational video, walking excursions and creative activities that deepen knowledge and experience with place in all its complexities (social history, citizen science, ecology and diversity).  Focusing on the Coldwater creek valley on McMaster’s West Campus, participants will learn about the history and unique features of the area and will be invited to then engage with the site through observation, sketching and stencil-making. Stencils will be used to paint text and image on the parking lot asphalt to delineate a blue line that marks an historic water route.  The project is supported by the McMaster Museum of Art (